What is the difference between a typeface and a font?
To firstly identify
the difference between a typeface and a font is crucial, the two are commonly
mistaken for each other yet the difference is dramatic. A typeface is a
collection of glyphs in the same style while a font is either a digital file or
a physical collection of a typeface in one weight and variation.
“The way I
relate the difference between typeface and font to my
students is by comparing them to songs and MP3s, respectively When
you talk about how much you like a tune, you don’t say: “That’s a great MP3”.
You say: “That’s a great song”. The MP3 is the delivery mechanism, not the
creative work; just as in type a font is the delivery mechanism and
a typeface is the creative work.”
The term ‘font’
originated from its reference to a collection of lead letter press characters
when using a letter press was the only method of printing type. In a modern
context, the term refers to a copy of the digital file in one weight and style
however due to the modern use of freely scalable type, the term has lost a
sense of distinction.
Within a typeface
family, there can be several variations including but not all: Helvetica Light,
Helvetica Regular, Helvetica Bold, Helvetica Italic, and Helvetica Oblique.
There are also variations containing two of these styles; Helvetica Light
Oblique for example originates from Helvetica Regular however is distorted to
the right while having a thinner stroke weight.
Italic and Oblique
are too commonly mistaken for each other while the difference is noticeable; an
Italic variation of a typeface is similar to an Oblique style. An Italic
variation of a typeface contains different characters to a regular font within
a typeface while an Oblique variation is the same typeface that has been
slightly skewed to an angle most commonly between 8-12 degrees. An Italic font
most commonly contains an alternate a
and k while also containing a
alternate serif.
There are several
classifications of typefaces, these classifications are used to organize
visually similar typefaces which often relates to its production:
Block - Block, black letter, Gothic, Old English, Black or Broken
typefaces are based on the ornate writing style prevalent during the Middle
Ages. Nowadays, they appear heavy and difficult to read as body copy however it
is believed that if a person from the time was to read a modern sans serif
typeface, it would be incredibly difficult as it is recognizable legibility
that determines readability.
Script - Designed to
imitate handwriting, script typefaces commonly imitate sable and bone methods
of production. Before digital and moving type, script typefaces were hard to
reproduce exactly.
Gothic - Sans Serif
typefaces originally produced for movable type within printing presses, these
typefaces are arguable less legible when used as body copy, however
very legible when used as header type.
Roman - Serif typefaces
originated from the production method of carving into stone with chisel, the
use of chisel created the need for a serif as a route for the chisel to start
and finish the strokes.
What is the difference between Legibility
and Readability?
Legibility is measured on the ease of
distinguishing individual glyphs and not the ease of readability. Legibility is
predominantly based on the typeface and how recognizable that glyph is on its
own, however legibility is subjective to a degree, a visually impaired person
may find it more difficult to distinguish the same glyph a person without
visual impairment may. Legibility is determined by the anatomy of that typeface,
large open counters, ample lowercase x-heights and character shapes that are
easily recognized are all features of a good legible glyph. Sans Serif
typefaces are most commonly believed to be more legible as their letter shapes
are simpler.
Readability is not determined by the
legibility of a single glyph but how a series of glyphs is understood and read.
It is defined by the ease of reading body copy, the continuity of identifying
the next line and a combination of speed and ease. The length of line, the
typeface and font used, leading, tracking and kerning governs readability.
The correct typeface is considered the most
important aspect of readability, although sans serif typefaces are more legible
than serif examples, it is commonly believed serif typefaces are better in
relation to readability as serifs create better distinguished characters at the
end and start of lines however it is argued that due to our modern cultures
longer exposure to serif typefaces, they are more recognizable when used in
body copy.
Line Length is the horizontal measure of a
line of type, long or short lines of copy can be tiring and can affect the
reader’s ability to drop to the next line. Robert Bringhurst’s consideration of
line length appears to be the most widely accepted;
‘A simple way to calculate the measure is to use Robert Bringhurst’s method which multiples the type size by 30. So if the type size is 10px, multiplying it by 30 gives you a measure of 300px or around 65 characters per line.’
‘A simple way to calculate the measure is to use Robert Bringhurst’s method which multiples the type size by 30. So if the type size is 10px, multiplying it by 30 gives you a measure of 300px or around 65 characters per line.’
Leading is the distance between baseline
and baseline; correctly spacing lines make it easier for a reader’s eye to
follow, while too little or too much creates difficulty as well as the density
of the composition creating tone.
Tracking and kerning are commonly mistaken
for one another, tracking relates to the equal spacing between characters while
kerning refers to spacing between two specific characters. Kerning is to be
used when two characters create a clear gap that can disrupt the flow of copy.
‘Av’ is commonly kerned when used in headlines, as is ‘Wa’. Kerning gently can
remove widows and orphans however tracking is agreed to be the better to use in
such situations. Tracking can be used to create a comfortable flow of
characters therefore affecting readability, as well as this, when left or right
aligned, the rag or the uneven side of the copy can create distracting gaps
and/or awkward shapes.
The difference between RGB and CMYK
RGB stands for red, green and blue, the
convergence of these three primary colours produces white, this is called
additive colour. Everything we see apart is emitted through light as RGB.
CMYK stands for Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and
Black, these are the four colours that we use to print. RGB cannot be used for
print as the overlaying of ink cannot be additive (create white) unlike RGB.
The overlaying of these 4 inks is subtractive which means a mergence of the
four creates black. Images are created using thousands of minute dots of CMYK
and the overlaying of these dots to create tones.
No comments:
Post a Comment