Thursday, March 31, 2016

OUGD603 / D&AD / Overview

D&AD Monotype

Purpose: To promote and campaign for nuclear disarmament.

Audience: The general public currently uninterested or believe in favor of renewing the Trident program. Most likely to be politically left aligned.

Why?: Myself and the CND want unilateral disarmament, to stop trident and it’s renewal.

Where / Context: Primarily focusing upon local campaigns until the national Stop Trident demonstration taking place across London on the 27th of February.

Application

What needs or can exist (Application)?

Currently: Banners / Placards / Stickers / Information leaflets & booklets & posters








Innovation: Protest Packs / Books / Graffiti aids / Personalized sign tools / Typeface / Online aid / Social media campaign / App / Product / Tote bags / Denim Jacket / Fabric Banners / Flags








Practical Considerations:

Making signs at home – cheap, fast, easy and able to assemble/disassemble quickly

Adaptions to laws:

No metal tubing / pools / wood – use cardboard rolls.

Wearing signs on head as hats / backpacks / umbrellas / shopping bags / paint on signs

Need for clear and concise signs / short / simple as protest material is seen instantly from great distances.

Print / Digital / Other

Print:

Paper / Fabric / Clothing / Card / Umbrella / Paint on Skin / Badges

Digital:

Instagram / GIF / Image / Website / Email / QR Code / #’s / Tumblr / FB

Other:
Props / Performance / Packaging / Book / Typeface / Posterzine

Design Considerations:

Production:

The production of protesting equipment needs to adhere to the context of the type of protest, the constraints of campaigning at home are different to them of partaking in a demonstration.

Campaigning at home may consist of communication tools placed in windows, walls or hung from buildings – similar to the flood of football related material seen around the times of international tournaments such as the World Cup. Campaigning at home may too consist of digital activism, be that posts to social media, the running of blogs or more extreme variations such as hacko-thons.

Experiencing the Stop Trident Demonstration in London on the 27th of February granted me the ability to understand the practical necessities for a demonstrator; Traveling through the underground with heavy banners and placards is impractical and discourages demonstrators from committing to use such tools. Many demonstrators travelled great distances to London on the day of the demonstration and intended of staying in and around the city after the demonstration, any materials that would be used as tools of communication through the day would have to be stored and carried with them in more orthodox social situations.

Communication tools at demonstrations then would benefit activists by being as of little convenience, being able to be assembled and disassembled in as little time and effort as possible.







Cost / Accessibility Considerations:

The cost of producing and possibly maintaining protest equipment would benefit from being as cheap as possible in order to cause as little financial inconvenience while making the act of protesting as accessible to the greatest amount of activists.

Legal Considerations:

How To Protest On The Right Side Of The Law (See Blog)

Can I decorate my wheelie bin? :

“As long as the covering does not damage the recycling bin or affect us collecting or emptying it we are happy for you to cover the bin. As long as the covering does not damage the recycling bin or affect us collecting or emptying it we are happy for you to cover the bin. Please note that we cannot be held responsible if the bin and/or its cover is lost, stolen or damaged. We can replace the bin but not the cover” Source GOV.UK

Production:

The production of protesting equipment needs to adhere to the context of the type of protest, the constraints of campaigning at home are different to them of partaking in a demonstration.

The context of campaigning dictates the form of protest material.

Campaigning from home may be print based flags, banners or posters in which the product is designed to last.





Digital Activism is produced digitally and will adhere to the social media platform is designed for.

Protest and demonstration require different production considerations, they have to be of little inconvenience, assembled and reassembled quickly and even hidden in the more extreme of cases.

Campaigning at home may consist of communication tools placed in windows, walls or hung from buildings – similar to the flood of football related material seen around the times of international tournaments such as the World Cup. Campaigning at home may too consist of digital activism, be that posts to social media, the running of blogs or more extreme variations such as hacko-thons.

Experiencing the Stop Trident Demonstration in London on the 27th of February granted me the ability to understand the practical necessities for a demonstrator; Traveling through the underground with heavy banners and placards is impractical and discourages demonstrators from committing to use such tools. Many demonstrators travelled great distances to London on the day of the demonstration and intended of staying in and around the city after the demonstration, any materials that would be used as tools of communication through the day would have to be stored and carried with them in more orthodox social situations.

Communication tools at demonstrations then would benefit activists by being as of little convenience, being able to be assembled and disassembled in as little time and effort as possible.


The D&AD brief demanded a visual language that can be used consistently through a range of at least 3 different applications. As these applications are to influence the visual language of the communication, I identified three formats that were to best fit with the CND campaign and demonstrations beforehand.



POSTER

Similar to the research undertaken for the dissertation, the visual language of protest graphics reflects the production and distribution of such. The production of CND poster, if not made and distributed by the official CND groups, are produced by individuals or collectives, most commonly using resources available to the common man.

Although hand-rendered typography is most commonly used in similar communications of agenda, digital manifestations offer greater legibility, due to clarity, and can even prove cheaper and more time efficient (if a computer and printer is already owned).

POSTER

Application informing design:

The presumption that the vast majority of people have access to a computer and printer is a safe assumption.

> 

The most readily available printer prints in an A4 format = A4 Paper

> 

Printing text in black is not only the cheapest, but allows coloured stock to be used. Printing coloured copy is more expensive and limits variation in stock, as does printing in negative (white) = Black Text


Application:

The campaigning leading up to the demonstration is just as important in communicating to potential demonstrators and collating a greater audience. Where is the best place to apply posters to capture the target audience cheaply and legally?

Without buying advertising space and breaking the law, promoting a cause publicly can be difficult. A similar communication is seen during football tournaments and elections, flags, banners, placards and posters decorate houses.

> 

With the application of wheatpaste (cheap and easy to make) paper can be applied to the majority of surfaces.

> 

Wheelie bins, an empty canvas, unavoidable, legal to decorate and each viewed by every passer-by, seemed more than fitting to use as a platform to communicate from.

=

A4, black copy (possible coloured stock) on wheelie bins with the use of wheat-paste.











DIGITAL

The first of two digital touch points was to home the ‘Print’ and ‘Other’ touch points; allowing potential and existing activists the ability to download the posters and to ‘order’ scarves. The website will also showcase curated #STOPTRIDENT material, give information surrounding Britain’s Trident program and conclude with a donation page.

The second of the two touch points focused upon social media platforms, sharing the same imagery found upon both the scarves and posters, to sit alongside written content to encourage the STOP TRIDENT agenda.





OTHER

“Experiencing the Stop Trident Demonstration in London on the 27th of February granted me the ability to understand the practical necessities for a demonstrator; Traveling through the underground with heavy banners and placards is impractical and discourages demonstrators from committing to use such tools. Many demonstrators travelled great distances to London on the day of the demonstration and intended of staying in and around the city after the demonstration, any materials that would be used as tools of communication through the day would have to be stored and carried with them in more orthodox social situations.”

Derived from my own research at demonstrations; noticing activists struggling carrying heavy placards around post-demonstration, I deduced communication tools would benefit activists by being as of little convenience, being able to be assembled and disassembled in as little time and effort as possible.

=

A platform of communication that is viable, light and can be kept on a person without tiresome holding = Fabric

=


A platform of communication that can communicate from a distance yet can be deconstructed and kept on a person made from fabric = scarf














Tuesday, March 29, 2016

OUGD602 / DBA / Hyperloop

*The documenting of the brief set by DBA sits within PPP, it is to focus on the professional manner of collaboration within a commercial environment and not the design practice.

The Team:

Kieran Walsh
George Boreham
Rory Blakemore
Jake Simmonds

A conscious decision between the group was made to cap the number of people within the team at 4, collectively we agreed our mergence of strengths would be considerable enough to tackle the brief efficiently.

George’s skillset, strengths, weaknesses and levels of effort were familiar to me therefore the decision to work collaboratively with him came at little questioning. His interest in branding would contrast my own practice (as identified in the design strategy presentation) of creative direction/ design for culture and commerce.

Rory’s practice is somewhat similar to my own although, notably from a music direction, rather than the fashion orientation I intend to take. His work for the TRIPTYCH brief impressed me and the design to collaborate came at no hindrance.

Jake’s practice, similar to Rory’s too reflected my own from a music direction although the difference in outcomes between the two is considerably different. Jake’s digital practice; web and app design, had previously impressed me.

The mergence of these specific 4 (myself included) creative’s practice could be considered unorthodox in relevance to the brand/identity brief for a commercial conglomerate - especially my own, Rory’s and Jake’s practice, which can be seen as great contrast to the nature of this brief.   This unorthodox approach, derived from our practices excited, not only ourselves, but DBA in our first meeting – an irregular team to approach such a commercial nature could create something unlike the stereotype.



The Schedule:

01/02/16 – 04/02/16:

Briefing

Conceive Group

Individual begin general research (Hyperloop, Context, Visual Language, Technology)

Collectively identifying Target Audience, Deliverables, Considerations and mandatory requirements.

Individual idea generation + application

05/02/16 – 07/02/16:

Collective initial meeting: Collating research and identifying possible concepts (5)

Collective concept refine and development

Individual visual drafts

08/02/16 – 09/02/16

Collectively refine initial ideas

Collective visual application of initial ideas

Collectively create presentation.

10/02/16

Critique with DBA to require presentation of initial ideas, development and 5 draft outcomes.

11/02/16

Response to feedback given in the previous day’s interim pitch

12/02/16 – 22/02/16

Responding to the feedback received in the interim critique we were to work collectively with the intent of adhering to the direction given by DBA.

23/02/16 - 25/02/16

Collate and create presentation ready for final pitch and judging.

26/02/16

Final HYPERLOOP pitch and judging



Collaboration practice:

Online sharing folders were set up after our initial meeting, the use of platforms such as Dropbox and Google Drive allow sharing, archving and accessing of collective files from several locations. Platforms like these are used in commercial environments – such as DAZED (See industry experience).

Regular scheduled meetings and deadlines- both individual and collective practice were to be set to deadlines with the intent of having an efficient, deadline-driven practice, as close to a true reflection of commercial environment as possible.


The Design Process (Pre-Interim Critique):

Identification of the Hyperloop’s greatest USPs – attributes to be communicated in order to sell the service to it’s target audience; the commuters currently flying between LA and San Francisco were identified initially in order to begin to decide the best manner in which to communicate them.

*Note: The identification of the route between LA and San Francisco as the initial Hyperloop route gave us the ability to create a design for this specific context although the ability to apply the same design to all potential Hyperloop routes was considered and adhered to.

> 

Several key points were deduced from into Must and Must Nots – this would begin to create a direction for the design to adhere to.

> 

Derived from several key points, concepts were created individually and discussed collectively in order to constructively criticize and develop.

> 

5 approaches were defined in order to develop further through collective, democratic discussion. We believed these 5 variations to be of the strongest concept and subsequent application into the visual.


















The Feedback:

The response from DBA was of constructive critique – the greatest points we deducted from this were:

The illustrating of technological attributes, such as the tube, are shallow. Very few people will use the service because of it’s construction but instead due to it’s offer of benefit to consumer – the saving of time and effort:

What can the average consumer do with the free time the Hyperloop will grant them? Family? Friends? Adventure? Relax? Socialise?

The majority of our outcomes were predictable, does ‘predictable’, ‘common’ or ‘average’ communicate Hyperloop, the exciting, new form of transport, to you?
The story you’re giving to the brand is dull, that is not fitting.


The Design Process (Post-Interim Critique):

Post critique, the team met up and discussed the best way to adhere to the given feedback. We had decided to start from the conceptual stage focusing upon a narrative, a concept that reflects an emotional value.

As the previous method of working individually and then meeting collectively to critique, merge and agree on ideas worked well pre-critique we thought best to continue this manner of team strategy.

With meetings every other day the team began to develop, what we considered, a concept and visual application that was a lot stronger than the initial proposal. With the development of our response the roles of each member naturally developed in order to benefit from each’s strengths.

Rory – Video
George – Mock up
Jake – Web and Digital
Mine – Advertising concept

This manner of working was incredibly efficient was most definitely the peak of the group’s efficiency.

After each had completed their given tasks, we collated all material and collectively curated a presentation with the hope of impressing DBA – before the presentation it would be agreed that I was to introduce the group and the proposal while each member would discuss their own input into the project throughout the presentation.






















In conclusion, I believe the process of working individually and regrouping worked incredibly well for this specific dynamic however I do appreciate this manner of working may not be as efficient for future group tasks. Working collectively does bring benefits and ensures the entirety of the team is working to the same ideal, rather than an individual’s practice taking a tangent while working individually. Unfortunately we did not win however the project itself was one of the strongest pieces of work I’ve seen and I am content to say I don’t think there was a better response.


I believe it is the extentsion and further application of concept that may have swayed the decision, the ability to present the hypothetical pitch as a reality with the help of extension proposals would have benefitted us greatly.